|
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT REFERENCE No 1 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
===============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? : YES
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? : NO
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? : NO
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? : NO
--------------------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
Versus P.C. PAREKH
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT REFERENCE No. 1 of 1991
MR SN SOPARKAR, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MRS. SWATI
S. SOPARKAR, MR. T.P.HIMANI & MR. M.K.KAJI for Petitioner
MR MEHUL S. SHAH for the Respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
Date of decision: 14/02/2003
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI for the Court)
1. This Reference is made under Section 21(5) of the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, by which the Council has
forwarded the case to this Court after finding the
respondent, who is a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, guilty of misconduct other than the
misconduct as is referred to in sub-section (4) of
Section 21 of the Act, and recommended removal of the
respondent's name from the Register of members of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India for a period
of six months.
2. The Charge levelled against the respondent in
respect of the alleged misconduct reads as under :
"The respondent had, authored a book entitled
"Tax Planning for Secret Income (Black Money)".
On going through the Preface as well as the
contents of the book, it was seen that the author
had explained in detail the various methods of
creation of black money followed by different
sections of society and the methods legal as well
as illegal generally adopted to convert the same
into white. Since it appeared that the title of
the book, its preface, its contents and in
totality the book was likely to create an
impression in the eyes of common man that the
Chartered Accountants are experts in helping in
the creation of black money and its conversion
into white money, though there is no direct
reference as such to the Chartered Accountants,
this might tend to lower the image of the
profession in the public eyes. It appears that
the conduct of the respondent in writing such a
book was unbecoming of a chartered accountants.
Thus, the respondent had committed professional
and / or other misconduct under Section 21 and 22
of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949."
3. The matter was placed before the Disciplinary
Committee for holding an inquiry against the respondent,
and the Disciplinary Committee, after giving an
opportunity of hearing to the respondent, found that the
respondent's argument that he had only described
practices followed in the generation of unaccounted money
cannot be accepted. The Committee observed that a
Chartered Accountant as a member of the institute, has a
role to play in the society and is required to observe
high standards of integrity and professional ethics and
is expected to discharge his professional obligation to
discourage tax evasion and not to publicise methods of
tax evasion which have the effect of educating the
public. It was found that, despite the respondent's
professed intention, the actual effect of the book
authored by him was to educate the public as to how to
evade tax and create unaccounted money. It was found
that the respondent's conduct in publicising methods of
tax evasion as narrated in the said book was unbecoming
of a member of the Institute. The Committee negatived
the argument that the Council cannot sit in judgement
over the merits and demerits of the contents of the book
authored by a member. It was held by the Committee that
the matter was referred to the respondent on 28th October
1985 and therefore, there was no delay on the part of the
Institution in initiating the proceedings. The Committee
concluded that, in its opinion, the respondent was guilty
of "other misconduct" under Section 21 read with Section
22 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Committee
consisted of a President and two members.
4. The report of the Disciplinary Committee placed
before the Council, which consisted of seventeen members
(excluding the members of the Committee), was taken up
for consideration in its 144th meeting on 8th June 1990.
The Council, after considering the written submissions of
the respondent and the report of the Disciplinary
Committee, reached the conclusion that the report of the
Disciplinary Committee was based on correct and cogent
reasons and deserved to accepted. The Council rejected
the contention that the Disciplinary Committee, in its
interpretation of misconduct, had gone beyond the scope
of its inquiry. Taking note of the earlier order made by
the Court on 11-11-1987 about the fact that there was no
question of violation of the petitioner's right to
freedom of speech and expression, the Council rejected
that contention.
5. The proceedings that took place before the
Disciplinary Committee which were minuted are on record.
The book authored by the respondent and the relevant
edition of the Code of Conduct have been supplied to the
Court by the learned counsel for the respondent and xerox
copies thereof are also placed on record. We have been
taken through the book in detail by both the sides and
also the material brought on record during the inquiry.
The stand taken by the respodnent including his answers
to the questions and material put to him during the
inquiry were referred to in great detail by both the
sides.
6. There is no dispute about the fact that the book
entitled "Tax - Planning For Secret Income (Black Money)"
was authored by the respondent, who is a Chartered
Accountant and a member of the Institute. The book was
first published in January 1982 and its second edition
was published in October 1982. Copyright was reserved
with the respondent. The book was published by Shri
H.P.Parekh, who is the son of the respondent. It was
printed by Shri B.P.Parekh, who is also the son of the
respondent. These facts appear from the book and are not
disputed. On the very first page, it is announced that
it is : "A Book indispensable to every Businessman,
Industrialist, Government Servant, Private employee,
Contractor & Engineer, Government Minister, Politican,
Limited Company, Partnership, Doctor, Lawyer, Actor,
Film-Wallahs, Tax-Practitioner Chartered Accountant and
Indian or Foreign citizen - IN NON-TECHNICAL & EASILY
UNDERSTANDABLE ENGLISH - (Income-tax; Wealth-tax;
Gift-tax : Estate Duty)". The book is entitled
"Tax-Planning For Secret Income (Black Money)", below
which, it is written, "Tax-Management of Black Money" on
the first page, where the contents of the book are shown
in brief. Below that page, the name of the respondent is
written, with his degrees and designation of Chartered
Accountant.
7. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the
Institute contended that the Council has found the
respondent guilty of misconduct other than the
professional misconduct on the basis of the material on
record gathered during the inquiry conducted by the
Disciplinary Committee, which has been statutorily
constituted. The Council has upheld the finding of the
Disciplinary Committee that, in publicising methods of
tax evasion as narrated in the book, the respodnent's
conduct was unbecoming of a member of the Institute. It
also upheld the finding of the Committee that the
argument of the respondent that he had only described the
practices followed in the generation of unaccounted
money, could not be accepted, and that the effect of the
book was to educate the public as to how to evade tax and
create unaccounted money. The learned Senior Counsel
argued that, on reading the book, it becomes clear that
these findings against the respondent are justified and
that the book was not intended merely to expose the
wrongs of tax evaders but it provided direct and indirect
suggestions as to the manner in which taxes could be
evaded. If the book was intended only to expose the
wrong doers, it would not have given details of the
methods that can be employed for the purpose of tax
evasion with illustrations and drafts of documents which
were to be fabricated and the false entries that were to
be made for the purpose of effective tax evasion. It was
contended that the professional body was entitled to take
disciplinary action against the member who acted against
professional ethics violating the principle of integrity
and truthfulness. He referred to the Code of Conduct
issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
(relevant edition), pointing out that the members of the
Institute were required to maintain high standards of
integrity and professional behaviour. He also referred
to the universally recognised principles of ethics which
were adopted in the profession of accountancy, including
by the Institute, and submitted that the expression
"other misconduct" appearing in Section 21(1) would
embrace every conceivable misconduct which may not have
been scheduled as a professional misconduct. It was also
submitted that there was no unrestricted fundamental
right of speech or expression, and that, if a member
wanted to remain a member of the Institute, he was bound
to abide by the behavioural rules laid down for such
members. It was submitted that the disciplinary action
was not meant to curb the fundamental right of speech and
expression. It was submitted that the Institute and the
Council were statutory bodies and the Council was
invested with statutory powers of taking disciplinary
action against the members also in respect of "other
misconduct" and the conduct of the respondent in writing
a book which had the effect of teaching the tax payers
(who were willing to adopt unfair means) and methods of
evading taxes in various fields and such a conduct which
was not in consonance with the Code of Conduct issued by
the Institute and the universally recognised principle of
ethics of integrity and truthfullness was clearly "other
misconduct", which warranted disciplinary proceedings
against the respondent.
7.1 In support of his contentions, the learned Senior
Counsel relied upon the following decisions :
[a] The decision of the Supreme Court in Council of
the Institute of Chartered Accountants v. B.
Mukherjea, reported in AIR 1958 SC 72, which was
rendered in the context of the provisions of
Sections 21 and 22 of the said Act, was cited for
the proposition that the misconduct alleged on
the part of the Chartered Accountants may not
attract any of the provisions in the Schedule and
may not, therefore, be regarded as falling within
the first part of Section 22; but if the
definition given by Section 22 itself purports to
be an inclusive definition and as the section
itself in its latter portion specifically
preserves the larger powers and jurisdiction
conferred upon the Council to hold inquiries by
Section 21 sub-section (1), it would not be right
to hold that such disciplinary jurisdiction can
be invoked only in respect of conduct falling
specifically and expressly within the inclusive
definition given by section 22. Section 8
sub-sections (v) and (vi) support the argument
that the disciplinary jurisdiction can be
exercised against Chartered Accountants even in
respect of conduct which may not fall expressly
within the inclusive definition contained in
Section 22. It was held that if a member of the
Institute was found, prima facie, guilty of
conduct which, in the opinion of the Council,
renders him unfit to be a member of the
Institute, even though such conduct may not
attract any of the provisions of the Schedule, it
would still be open to the Council to hold an
inquiry against the member in respect of such
conduct and a finding against him in such an
inquiry would justify appropriate action being
taken by the High Court under Section 21(3).
(emphasis added). (See paragraph 5 of the
judgement).
[b] The decision of the Supreme Court in the matter
of Mr. "P", an Advocate, reported in AIR 1963 SC
1313, which was rendered in context of misconduct
of an advocate was cited to point out that the
Supreme Court, in paragraphs 7 and 8 of its
judgement, held that wherever conduct proved
against an Advocate is contrary to honesty, or
opposed to good morals, or is unethical, it may
be safely be held that it involves moral
turpitude. The Supreme Court observed that, in
dealing with the matter of professional
propriety, we cannot ignore the fact that the
profession of law is an honourable profession and
it occupies a place of pride in the liberal
professions of the country. Any conduct which
makes a person unworthy to belong to the noble
fraternity of lawyers or makes an advocate unfit
to be entrusted with the responsible task of
looking after the interests of the litigant must
be regarded as conduct involving moral turpitude.
It was held that; "An Advocate invites
disciplinary orders not only if he is guilty of
professional misconduct; but also if he is guilty
of other misconduct; and this other misconduct
which may not be directly concerned with his
professional activity, as such, may nevertheless
be of such a dishonourable or infamous character
as to invite the punishment due to professional
misconduct itself". It was held that the
advocate on record acted with gross negligence in
the matter of taxation of costs of his client in
the appeal filed in the Supreme Court and such
conduct amounted to professional or other
misconduct within the meaning of that expression
in the rules of Order IV - A of the Supreme Court
Rules. The name of the advocate was ordered to
be removed from roll for five years.
[c] The decision of the Supreme Court in N.G.Dastane
v. Shrikant S. Shivde, reported in AIR 2001 SC
2028, which was rendered in context of the
provisions of section 35 of the Advocates Act,
1961, by which the State Bar Council was
empowered to refer the case for disposal to its
disciplinary committee when it had reason to
believe that any advocate on its roll has been
guilty of "professional or other misconduct", was
cited to point out that, it was held by the
Supreme Court; "The collocation of the words
"guilty of professional or other misconduct" has
been used for the purpose of conferring power on
the disciplinary committee of the State Bar
Council. It is for equipping the Bar Council
with the binocular as well as whip to be on the
qui vive for trading out delinquent advocates who
transgress the norms or standards expected of
them in the discharge of their professional
duties. The central function of the legal
profession is to help promotion of administration
of justice. Any misdemeanor or misdeed or
misbehaviour can become an act of delinquency, if
it infringes such norms or standards, and it can
be regarded as misconduct". The Supreme court
held that an advocate abusing the process of
court is guilty of the misconduct.
[d] The decision of the Supreme Court in R.D.Saxena
v. Balaram Prasad Sharma, reported in AIR 2000
SC 2912 was cited to pointed out that, it was
held in paragraph 19 of the judgement that the
word "misconduct" used in the expression
"misconduct, professional or otherwise" in
section 35 of the Advocates Act was a relative
term and it had to be considered with reference
to the subject matter and context herein such
term occurs. It literally means wrong conduct or
improper conduct.
[e] The decision of the Supreme Court in P.
Balakotaiah v. Union of India, reported in AIR
1958 SC 232 was cited for the proposition that,
even if a person had a right to form association
under Article 19(1)(c), there would not be a
fundamental right to continue in employment by
the State and when their (i.e. members of the
association) services are terminated by the
State, they cannot complain of the infringement
of any of their constitutional right when no
question of violation of Article 311 arises.
[f] The decision of the Supreme Court in
M.H.Devendrappa v. the Karnataka State Small
Industries Development Corporation, reported in
AIR 1998 SC 1064 was cited for the proposition
that the Code of Conduct required to be observed
with proper discharge of functions by a
government servant cannot be flouted in the name
of other freedoms. The Court was concerned with
Rule 22 of the Service rules under which the
employer was entitled to take disciplinary
action. That rule was not meant to curtail
freedom of speech or expression or the freedom to
form association or union, but it was clearly
meant to maintain discipline within the service
to ensure efficient performance of duty by the
employees of the Corporation and to protect the
interest and prestige of the Corporation. The
Supreme Court held that, a rule which is not
primarily designed to restrict any of the
fundamental rights, cannot be called in question
as violating Article 19(1)(a) or 19(1)(c) of the
Constitution. (See paragraph 13 of the
judgement).
[g] The decision of the Supreme Court in Jamuna
Prasad Mukhariya v. Lachhi Ram, reported in AIR
1954 SC 686, which was rendered in context of the
provisions of Sections 123(5) and 124(5) of the
Representation of the Peoples Act and Article
245(1) of the Constitution, was cited to point
out that, in paragraph 5 of the judgement, the
Supreme Court negative the contention that
Article 245(1) prohibited the making of laws
which violate the Constitution, and that the
impugned sections interfered with a citizen's
fundamental right to freedom of speech. It was
held that the provisions did not stop a man from
speaking, but they merely prescribe conditions
which must be observed, if he wanted to enter the
Parliament. The Court held: "The right to stand
as a candidate and contest an election is not a
common law right. It is a special right created
by the statute and can only be exercised on the
conditions laid down by the statute. The
Fundamental Rights Chapter has no bearing on a
right like this created by statute. The
appellants have no fundamental right to be
elected members of Parliament. If they want that
they must observe the rules. If they prefer to
exercise their right of free speech outside these
rules, the impugned sections do not stop them.
We hold that these sections are `intra vires".
[h] The decision of the Supreme Court in Sakhawant
Ali v. State of Orissa, reported in AIR 1955 SC
166, was cited for the proposition that there is
no fundamental right for any person to stand as a
candidate for election to the Municipality and
that the only fundamental right which is
guaranteed is that of practising any profession
or carrying on any occupation, trade or business.
The Court held; "if he wants to stand as a
candidate for election, then it is but proper
that he should divest himself of his paid brief
on behalf of the municipality or the brief
against the municipality in which event there
will be certainly no bar to his candidature.
Even if it be taken as a restriction on his right
to practice his profession of law, such
restriction would be a reasonable one and well
within the ambit of Article 19 Clause 5. Such
restriction would be a reasonable one to impose
in the interests of the general public for the
preservation of purity in public life."
[i] The decision of the Supreme Court in Railway
Board v. Niranjan Singh, reported in AIR 1969 SC
966 was cited for the proposition that there is
no fundamental right for anyone to hold meetings
in government premises. The Court held in
paragraph 13 of the judgement; "The fact that the
citizens of this country have freedom of speech,
freedom to assembly peaceably and freedom to form
associations or unions does not mean that they
can exercise those freedoms in whatever place
they please. The exercise of those freedoms will
come to an end as soon as the right of someone
else to hold his property intervenes. Such a
limitation is inherent in the exercise of those
rights. The validity of that limitation is not
to be judged by the tests prescribed by
sub-Articles (2) and (3) of Article 19. In other
words, the contents of the freedoms guaranteed
under Clauses (a), (b) and (c), the only freedoms
with which we are concerned in this appeal, do
not include the right to exercise them in the
properties belonging to others."
[j] The decision of the Pepsu High Court in Jang
Bahadur Sant Lal v. The Principal, Mohindra
College, reported in AIR 1951 SC 59 was cited for
the proposition that, apart from the
qualifications enumerated in Clauses 2 to 6 of
Article 19, the rights guaranteed by Clause (1)
are also subject to the qualification that the
exercise of these rights by a citizen should not
infringe the rights of others. The Court held
that where a student of a college issued a
handbill and therein tried to make out that the
authorities were not only antinationals, but
selfish, evil-minded, morally degenerate and
given to intrigue, subversive and heinous
activities and victimization of innocent students
etc. etc., the writing not only offended against
the discipline but against the ordinary law of
the land.
[k] The decision of the Bombay High Court in Indulal
K. Yagnik v. State, reported in AIR 1960 BOM.
399 was cited for the proposition that, inducing
a police officer of whatever grade, including a
constable, to withhold his services or to commit
breach of the rules of discipline would be
incitement to commit an offence, and therefore,
the restrictions imposed against the right of
freedom of speech from inciting an offence spoken
of in section 145 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951
would be well protected by clause (2) of Article
19 of the Constitution. (See paragraph 20 of the
judgement).
[l] The decision of the Mysore High Court in H.A.K.
Rao v. Council of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, reported in AIR 1965 MYSORE
112 was cited for the proposition that, failure
to conform to the statutory requirements may lead
to disciplinary action being taken against the
concerned member, and that may result in
interference with his right to carry on as a
Chartered Accountant; but this result is merely
incidental to his being a member of the
institute. If a member does not wish to conform
to the requirements of the institute, it would be
open to him to relinquish his membership of the
institute. The Court relied upon the decision of
the Supreme court in Jamuna Prasad Mukhariya
(supra) and Sakhawant Ali (supra), while coming
to this conclusion.
8. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent
argued that the misconduct alleged against the respondent
was not a professional misconduct as enumerated in the
Schedules to the Act, but it amounted to "other
misconduct" which was required to be notified under Part
II (2)(b) of the Schedule. It was submitted that there
was no embargo against writing books and therefore, mere
writing of such a book was not a misconduct. Moreover,
there was no notification issued by the Council under
Part II(2)(b) of the Schedule declaring writing of any
particular type of book as a misconduct. It was
submitted that disciplinary proceedings under the Act
were of a quasi-criminal nature and therefore, unless the
misconduct was notified, a member cannot be charged for
such misconduct. It was further contended that the
intention of the respondent in writing the book was only
to inform the public about things which were happening in
the society so that they become aware of such instances
and understand the consequences thereof. It was argued
that there was nothing in the book which was likely to
create an impression that the Chartered Accountants were
expert in creating black money, nor was there anything in
it which would lower the image of the profession. It
was, therefore, submitted that there was no basis for
proceeding against the respondent on these charges. The
learned counsel further contended that the disciplinary
authority had gone beyond the charges levelled against
the respondent by stating that, the effect of this
writing was to educate the public as to how to evade the
tax and how to create black money. It was submitted that
the respondent had done nothing which could be termed as
educating the public. He then argued that the respondent
had a fundamental right of speech and expression to
inform the public about the things that were happening in
the society, even if the writing may not have been
palatable to a section of the public. He submitted that
the tenor of the book does not go to suggest that the
Chartered Accountants were helping to create black money,
nor was any advice given by the author in that regard.
He quoted various portions of the book (pages 48, 50, 60,
70, 80 etc.) for pointing out that the author had
referred to the legal provisions and stated that the tax
evasion was illegal. It was submitted that there was
nothing in the book that would show that he advocated tax
evasion. It was further argued that the Council had not
given any detailed reasons for its findings and had
merely agreed with the reasoning of the Disciplinary
Committee and therefore, the impugned action was
vitiated. It was also submitted that there was delay in
initiation of the proceedings against the respondent
which showed that the authority was biased against the
respondent. On the issue of punishment, the learned
counsel submitted that the proposed penalty of removing
the name of the respondent from the register for a period
of six months was excessive and even if the respondent
was found to be guilty, "reprimand" would serve the
interest of justice in the facts and circumstances of the
case, particularly when a long time of about twenty years
has elapsed since the book was published.
8.1 In support of his submissions, the learned
counsel relied upon the following decisions :
[a] The decision of the Supreme Court in A.L.Kalra v.
The Project and Equipment Corporation of India
Ltd., reported in AIR 1984 SC 1361 was cited to
point out that the Supreme Court, in context of
Rules 4 and 5 of the Project and equipment
Corporation of India Ltd. Employees' (Conduct,
Discipline and Appeal) Rules (1975), held that it
cannot be left to the vagaries of the management
to say ex post facto that some act of omission or
commission nowhere found to be enumerated as
misconduct in the relevant standing order is
nonetheless a misconduct for the purpose of
imposing a penalty. Rule 4(1) of those Rules
provided that every employee shall at all times
maintain absolute integrity and do nothing which
is unbecoming of a public servant. Rule 5
prescribed various misconducts for which action
can be taken against an employee governed by
those rules. The Supreme Court held that, what
in a given context would constitute conduct
unbecoming of a public servant to be treated as
misconduct would expose a grey area not amenable
to objective evaluation. Where misconduct when
proved entails penal consequences, it is
obligatory on the employer to specify and if
necessary define it with precision and accuracy
so that any ex post facto interpretation of some
incident may not be camouflaged as misconduct.
It will be noticed that the decision is rendered
in context of the statutory requirement that the
misconduct should be enumerated.
[b] The decision of the Supreme Court in M/s Glaxo
Laboratories (I) Ltd. v. Presiding Officer,
Labour Court, Meerut, reported in AIR 1984 SC
505, to point out that the Supreme Court
negatived the contention that the expression
"misconduct" prescribed in Standing Order 23
would comprehend any misconduct irrespective of
the fact whether it is enumerated in Standing
Order 22 or not. It noted that Section 3(2) of
the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act
Act (20 of 1946) requires the employers in an
industrial establishment while preparing draft
standing orders to make provision in such draft
for every matter set out in the Schedule which
may be applicable to the industrial
establishment, and that therefore, the statutory
obligation upon the employer to draw up with
precision those acts of omission and commission
which in his industrial establishment would
constitute misconduct. In this context, it was
held that, in the face of the statutory
provision, it would be difficult to entertain the
submission that some other act of omission which
may be misconduct though not provided for in the
standing order would be punishable under standing
order 23.
[c] The decision of the Supreme Court in Rasiklal
Vaghajibhai Patel v. Ahmedabad Municipal
Corporation, reported in AIR 1985 SC 504 was
cited for the proposition that, it is a well
settled canon of penal jurisprudence that removal
or dismissal from service on account of the
misconduct constitutes penalty in law - that the
workman sought to be charged for misconduct must
have adequate advance notice of what action or
what conduct would constitute misconduct. The
Supreme court followed its earlier decision in
M/s Glaxo Laboratories (I) Ltd. (supra) for this
proposition.
[d] The decision of the Supreme Court in Life
Insurance Corporation of India v. Prof.
Manubhai D. Shah, reported in AIR 1993 SC 171
was cited for the proposition that it was
manifest from Article 19(2) that the right
conferred by Article 19(1)(a) was subject to
imposition of reasonable restrictions in the
interest of, amongst others, public order,
decency or morality or in relation to defamation
or incitement to an offence. The Supreme Court
held that it had always placed a broad
interpretation on the value and content of
Article 19(1)(a), making it subject only to the
restrictions permissible under Article 19(2).
Efforts by intolerant authorities to curb or
suffocate this freedom have always been firmly
repelled. More so when public authorities have
betrayed autocratic tendencies. (See paragraph
10 of the judgement).
[e] The decision of the Supreme Court in Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India v. L.K.Ratna,
reported in AIR 1987 SC 71 was cited for the
proposition that the Council must state the
reasons for its finding that a member is guilty
of misconduct. (See paragraph 30 of the
judgement).
[f] The decision of the Supreme Court in Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India v. P.K.Mukherjee,
reported in AIR 1968 SC 1104 was cited to point
out that, in a case where a Chartered Accountant
was found guilty of misconduct, the Supreme
Court, while observing that, in its opinion, the
conduct of the member was wholly unworthy of a
Chartered Accountant who was expected to maintain
a high standard of professional conduct, and that
proper punishment would have been to remove his
name from the Register for a limited period,
awarded punishment of severe reprimand for his
misconduct under Section 21(2) of the Act on the
ground that the proceedings had been pending
against him for a long time.
[g] The decision of the Supreme Court in
H.V.Panchaksharappa v. K.G.Eshwar, reported in
AIR 2000 SC 3344 was cited for the proposition
that a charge of professional misconduct is in
the nature of a quasi-criminal charge, and that
such a charge required to be proved in the manner
of proving a criminal charge and the nature of
proof required to prove it, is that of beyond a
reasonable doubt.
[h] The decision of the Calcutta High Court in
Pramatha Nath v. The State, reported in AIR 1951
CAL. 581 was cited to point out that, it was
held by the Calcutta High Court that an advice
was not necessarily abetment. In order that
there may be abetment, there must be either
instigation or intentional aiding or engaging in
a conspiracy as laid down in Section 107 of the
Penal Code. General advice is far too vague an
expression to prove abetment under the Penal
Code. On facts, it was held that there was no
evidence what the advice was.
[i] The decision of the Allahabad High Court in Nazir
Ahmad v. Emperor, reported in AIR 1927 Alh.
730(2) was cited to point out that, in a case
where there is nothing to show, that when he
uttered the remarks noted in the judgement, he
ever intended thereby to induce applicant and
others to further beat the complainant, the Court
held that the sentence of one month's rigorous
imprisonment would meet the ends of justice.
[j] The decision of the Patna High Court in Raghunath
Dass v. Emperor, reported in AIR 1920 PATNA 502
was cited for the proposition that instigation
necessarily indicates some active suggestion, or
support or stimulation to the commission of the
act itself, and advice can become an instigation
only if it is found that it was an advice which
was meant actively to suggest or stimulate the
commission of an offence. Advice per se cannot
necessarily be instigation within the meaning of
Section 107 Clause (1) - IPC.
[k] The decision of the Supreme Court in L.D.Jai
Shinghani v. Naraindas M. Punjabi, reported in
AIR 1976 SC 373 was cited for the proposition
that, in a case involving possible disbarring of
the Advocate concerned, the evidence should be of
a character which should leave no reasonable
doubt about his guilt.
9. The historical development of the organized
profession of Chartered Accountants shows that, having
regard to the functions of the public accountants which
were of great and increasing importance, a number of
societies came to be constituted of accountants aiming at
"the elevation of the profession of public accountants as
a whole and the promotion of their efficiency and
usefulness by compelling observance of strict rules of
conduct as a condition of membership and by setting up a
high standard of professional and general education and
knowledge and otherwise". (See Royal Chartered of the
11th may 1880 incorporating the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales having regard to its
laudable intention).
9.1 The International Federation of Accountants, of
which Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and
Institute of Cost & Works Accountants of India are
members, "recognizing the responsibilities of the
accountancy profession as such, and considering its own
role to be that of providing guidance, encouraging
continuity of efforts, and promoting harmonization, has
deemed it essential to establish an international Code of
Ethics for Professional Accountants to be the basis on
which the ethical requirements (code of ethics, detailed
rules, standards of conduct etc.), for professional
accountants in each country should be founded." The
International Code is intended to serve as a model on
which to base the national ethical guidance. It sets
standards of conduct for professional accountants and
states the fundamental principles that should be observed
by them. The International Code of Ethics for
professional accountants is established on the basis of
that the objectives and fundamental principles are
equally valid for all professional accountants, whether
they be in public practice, industry, commerce, public
sector or education.
9.2 A hallmark of any noble profession is adherence
by its members to a common code of values and conduct
established by its administrative body, including
maintaining an outlook which is essentially objective and
acceptance of a duty to the society as a whole.
Acceptance of its responsibility to public is a
distinguishing mark of a procession. A large section of
public relies on the objectivity and integrity of
professional accountants to maintain the orderly
functioning of commerce. Such reliance imposes a public
interest responsibility on the accounting profession.
Professional accountants have an important role to play
in the society. Investors, creditors, employees and
other sectors of the business community as well as the
government and the public at large rely on professional
accountants for sound financial accounting and reporting,
effective financial management and competent advice on a
variety of business and taxation matters. The attitude
and behaviour of the professional accountants in
providing such services have an impact on the economic
well-being of their community and the country.
9.3 It is in the best interest of the worldwide
accountancy profession to make known to the users of the
services provided by the professional accountants that
they are executed at the highest level of performance and
in accordance with the ethical requirements that strive
to ensure such performance. This is why the code of
ethics keeps in mind the public service and user
expectations of ethical standards of professional
accountants, to keep up to the expected standards.
9.4 Thus, the universally recognized objectives of
accountancy profession are to work to the highest
standards of professionalism, to attain the highest
levels of performance and generally to meet the public
interest requirement. These objectives require four
basic needs to be met, namely, (i) credibility in
information and information systems, (ii)
professionalism, (iii) quality of services and confidence
of users of professional service of professional
accountants; and, (iv) a framework of professional ethics
which governs the provision of those services.
10. In order to achieve the objectives of the
accountancy profession, professional accountants have to
observe a number of prerequisites or fundamental
principles, which are, integrity, objectivity,
professional competence and due care, respect
confidentiality of information, good professional
behaviour and observance of high technical and
professional standards. Professional integrity implies
not mere honesty but fair dealing and truthfulness. The
principle of objectivity imposes an obligation on all
professional accountant to be fair, intellectually honest
and free of conflicts of interest. Professional
accountants should therefore protect the integrity of
their professional services and maintain objectivity in
their judgement. A professional accountant should act in
a manner consistent with the good reputation of the
profession and refrain from any conduct which might bring
discredit to the profession.
10.1 A professional accountant rendering professional
tax services is entitled to put forward the best position
in favour of a client, or an employer, provided the
service is rendered with professional competence, does
not in any way impair integrity and objectivity, and is
in the opinion of the professional accountant consistent
with the law. The professional accountant is under an
obligation to take necessary steps to ensure that the tax
return is properly prepared on the basis of the
information received. He should not be associated with
any return or communication in which there is a reason to
believe that it contains a false or misleading statement,
contains statements or information furnished recklessly
or without any real knowledge of whether they are true or
false, or omits or obscures information required to be
submitted and such omission or obscurity would mislead
the revenue authorities. These professional standards
are imperative and arise from the fundamental principle
that a professional accountant should be straight forward
and honest in performing professional services. [See
Part A. Section 1 Clause (1) and Section 5 Clauses (5.1)
and (5.5) of the Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (IFAC)].
10.2 Even the terms of employment of the employed
members cannot require them to be implicated in any
dishonest transaction. If they are instructed or
encouraged to engage in any activity which is unlawful
they are entitled and required to decline. They should
not be party to falsification of any record or knowingly
or recklessly supply any information or make any
statement which is misleading, false or deceptive in any
material particular.
11. Professional accountants may encounter in the
course of their work offences, such as, theft, obtaining
undue gain by deception, false accounting and suppression
of documents; fraud, forgery and offences in relation to
companies; perjury and offennces under the Prevention of
Corruption Act; bankrupancy or insolvency offences,
frauds on creditors or customers, false trade
decriptions, and offences arising out of relations
between employers and employees; conspiracy, soliciting
or inciting to commit crime and attempting to commit
crime; offences in relation to direct and indirect
taxation (including value added tax and excise duties).
A professional accountant cannot be an accessory to the
commission of such offences nor can he incite the
taxpayers to adopt illegal means to evade taxes when it
is his professional duty to make clear to the person
engaging him, the effect of his professional obligation
of integrity which requires that if there is no full
disclosure, he should indicate this in any accounts or
reports that he prepares.
11.1 The Chartered Accountant himself commits criminal
offence - [a] if he incites anyone to commit a criminal
offence whether or not his advice is accepted, or [b] if
he helps or encourages anyone in the planning or
execution of a criminal offence which is committed, or
[c] if he agrees with anyone to prevent or obstruct the
course of justice by concealing, destroying or
fabricating evidence or by misleading the authorities by
a statement which he knows to be untrue, or [d] if with a
view to obtaining property or to obtaining for himself or
another pecuniary advantage he deceives any person,
either making a statement which he knows to be false or,
in certain circumstances, by making a statement but
suppressing matters relevant to a proper appreciation of
its significance.
12. The Code of Conduct issued by the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India records that it is
necessary for the Institute "to guide and compel the
members to live upto these high standards. The prestige
and confidence enjoyed by a profession, to a great
extent, is dependent on strictness and scrupulosity with
which such a Code is interpreted and not necessarily by
legislation or regulations as much by self-discipline".
It is also stated that the Council in addition to
"professional misconduct" as defined in Section 22 of the
Act has been given power to inquire into the conduct of
any member of the institution under circumstances other
than those specified in the Schedules to the Act. The
Council is not debarred from inquiring into the conduct
of any member of the institute under any other
circumstances, as asserted in the Code. This aspect is
fully borne out by the expression "professional or other
misconduct" occurring in Section 21. The power of the
Council to inquire into "other misconduct" which is not
mentioned in the Schedules is placed beyond any pale of
controversy by the decision of the Supreme Court in
Institute of Chartered Accountants v. B. Mukharajea
(supra) in which the Supreme Court has, in terms, held
that, if a member of the Institute is found, prima facie,
guilty of conduct which, in the opinion of the Council,
renders him unfit to be a member of the Institute, even
though such conduct may not attract any of the provisions
of the schedule, it would still be open to the Council to
hold an inquiry against the member in respect of such
conduct and a finding against him in such an inquiry
would justify appropriate action being taken by the High
Court. It was held that though the definition of the
material expression used in Section 21(1) refers to the
acts and omissions specified in the schedule, the list of
the said acts and omissions is not exhaustive; and in any
event, the said list does not purport to limit the powers
of the Council under Section 21(1), which may otherwise
flow from the words used in the said sub-section itself.
It was held that it would not be right to hold that such
disciplinary jurisdiction can be invoked only in respect
of conduct falling specifically and expressly within the
inclusive definition given by Section 22.
12.1 Members of the Institute are bound to act in a
manner consistent with the good reputation of the
profession. They should refrain from any conduct which
might bring discredit to the institute. Members should
be guided not merely by the terms, but also by the spirit
of the Code of Conduct and the fact that particular
conduct does not receive mention does not prevent it from
being unacceptable or discreditable conduct, thus making
a member liable to disciplinary action. After all, code
of ethics draws community ethics and moral principles
into the professional institutions. There is a need
to arrive at a balance between the interests of the
member as a citizen in expressing views in the matters of
public concern and the interest of the institution in
preserving the status and dignity of the professionals
rendering service as Chartered Accountants.
13. The contention canvassed on behalf of the
respondent that such "other conduct" should be a conduct
notified in the gazette of India under Part II (2) of the
Schedule, runs counter to the express provisions of
section 22 which, in terms, provides that, nothing in
section 22 shall be construed to limit or abridge in any
way the power conferred or duty cast on the Council under
sub-section (1) of section 21 to inquire into the conduct
of any member of the institute under any other
circumstances. If the Council specifies any other act or
omission by notification in the gazette under Part II
(2), that would be deemed to be a professional
misconduct, because, as provided in the opening words of
Part II of the Second Schedule, "A member of the
Institute, whether in practice or not, shall be deemed to
be guilty of professional misconduct, if he is guilty of
such other act or omission as may be specified by the
Council in this behalf, by notification in the Gazette of
India under Clause (2) of Part II. It is not possible to
encompass within a statutory enactment all myriad
situations situations that arise in the course of
profession that would amount to misconduct. Thus, "other
misconduct" will be any misconduct which is not specified
in the Schedule or notified thereunder.
13.1 Under section 8 of the said Act, a person shall
not be entitled to have his name entered in or borne on
the Register if he has been removed from membership of
the Institute on being found on inquiry to have been
guilty of professional or other misconduct. Thus, not
only for the professional misconduct specified in the
Schedule but also for any other misconduct not so
specified, the member guilty of such other misconduct can
be removed by the Institute after due inquiry.
13.2 In the Code of Conduct of the Institute, it has
been clarified that the use of the words "or other" in
Section 21 is important inasmuch as the Council thereby
is empowered to inquire into any misconduct of a member
even if it does not arise within his professional work.
This is considered necessary, for "a Chartered Accountant
is expected to maintain the highest standards of
integrity in his professional conduct and any deviation
from this high standards even in personal (not
professional) affairs, would expose a Chartered
Accountant to a disciplinary inquiry e.g. if a Chartered
Accountant is found to have forged membership of the
institute, even though this was not done in the course of
his duties". (emphasis added).
13.3 Appendix to the Code of Conduct deals with role
of Chartered Accountants in relation to unlawful acts by
their clients, pointing out that the Income Tax Act, 1961
contains a number of provisions intended to prevent and /
or to punish the tax frauds by an assessee. While
considering the extent of Chartered Accountants direct
liability in respect of such frauds by his clients and
also what his professional conduct should be in cases
where there is no question of his clients' involvement,
it is pointed out that sections 277 and 278 of the Act
involve a member into direct liability, in respect of tax
frauds by his client. Under section 277, any person who
delivers an account or statement which is false, and
which he either knows or believes to be false, or does
not believe to be true, is liable to prosecution, and on
conviction, may be sentenced to simple imprisonment for a
term upto six months, and / or with fine upto
Rs.1,000=00. The information furnished under Rule 12A of
the Income-tax Rules, 1962, by a Chartered Accountant
will be a "statement" within the meaning of section 277.
If this contains anything which is false and which the
member knows or believes to be false or does not believe
to be true, he would be rendering himself liable to
prosecution. Section 278 makes punishable the abetment
of false returns. To sustain charge of abetment, it is
not necessary that the act abetted should be committed.
The offence is complete as soon as the abettor has
incited another to commit a crime, whether the latter
consents or not or having consented, he commits the crime
or not. Willful attempt to evade tax is a serious
offence punishable under Section 276C. Making of false
entry or statement in books of account or other documents
or omissions of relevant entry or statement in such books
of account or other documents would amount to willful
attempt to evade any tax, penalty or interest.
13.4 Apart from the offences under Sections 277 and
278 of the Act, tax frauds may entail liability for
non-compoundable offences under various provisions of the
Indian Penal Code. A given conduct may amount to
falsification of accounts under section 477A of the IPC,
punishable upto seven years' rigorous imprisonment;
forgery for the purpose of cheating punishable upto seven
years' rigorous imprisonment under section 468 of the
IPC; forgery of valuable security etc. punishable under
section 467 of the IPC upto ten years' rigorous
imprisonment; destroying valuable security or secreting
it punishable under Section 477 punishable for life
imprisonment or upto ten years' rigorous imprisonment.
13.5 Since the proceeding before an Income-tax
Authority is a judicial proceeding under Section 136 of
the Income Tax Act within the meaning of section 193 and
196 of the IPC, false evidence and use of evidence known
to be false will be offences punishable under those
provisions besides the offences under sections 177, 188
and 199 of the IPC, relating to false information, false
statement on oath etc. and false statement in
declaration to which pointed attention has been drawn in
the Code of Conduct issued by the Institution.
13.6 Section "B" of the Appendix to the Code
emphasizes in para 16(c) that it is not the duty of a
member to shield a client from the consequences of his
tax frauds; "on the contrary it is a guiding principle of
professional conduct to discourage tax evasion".
14. It is a fundamental duty of every citizen "to
strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual
and collective activity". The profession of Chartered
Accountant is a noble profession and is regulated by the
norms of behaviour of its members which are universally
recognized. Though "professional misconduct" is
enumerated in the Schedule, the statute clearly takes
into account "other misconduct" by such professionals
which may warrant removal of a delinquent member by the
Council. The Council is under a duty to ensure that the
members keep up to the high standards that govern the
profession. The words "professional or other misconduct"
in section 21 confers wide powers on the Council by which
it can take disciplinary action not only in respect of
the professional misconduct specified in the Schedule or
notified by it, but any other misconduct of a Chartered
Accountant which is such that he must be regarded
unworthy to remain a member of the noble profession to
which he has been admitted and unfit to be entrusted with
the responsible duties attached to his calling. The word
"misconduct" in the context of section 21, having regard
to the scope of the said Act, would be conduct that is
wrong, improper, unlawful or a transgression of an
established and definite rule or Code of Conduct. The
ambit of "misconduct" has to be construed with reference
to the subject matter and the context where the term
occurs, regard being had to the scope of the statute and
the public purpose it seeks to serve, as held by the
Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Ram Singh,
Ex-Constable, reported in 1992(4) SCC 54. The word
"misconduct" receives its connotation from the context,
the delinquency in its performance, its effect on the
discipline, and the nature of the duty.
15. The High Court has been entrusted important
function in context of the behaviour of the members of
this noble profession in the disciplinary matters which
come up before it. It has wide powers extending to
removal from membership of the institute either
permanently or for a specified period. It may direct the
proceedings to be filed or dismiss the complaint. This
enables the court to examine the nature of misconduct
alleged and the facts and circumstances brought on record
in connection therewith against the delinquent. There is
a serious responsibility on the Court - a duty to itself,
to the profession, and to the whole of the community to
be careful not to accredit any person as worthy of the
public confidence who cannot establish his right to that
credential. However, when an important statutory body
like the Council finds a member of the institute guilty
of the misconduct and forwards the case to the High Court
with its recommendation under Section 21(5) of the Act,
its findings based on the material on record would
ordinarily not be disturbed unless found to be unjust,
unwarranted or contrary to law.
16. The plea of the respondent, that his intent
behind writing this book, exposing the ways in which
black money was generated and how the tax was evaded, was
just to inform the public the things which were happening
in the society so that they become aware of the
consequences thereof, is a sheer exercise in hypocrisy.
There are scores of places in the book which clearly
indicate that the intention of the author was not just to
expose the evils of generation of "black money" and
evasion of taxes, but to lay down in an easy "do it
yourself", way the methods in which the "black money"
that can be generated is turned "white" or the ways by
which taxes can be evaded by the tax payers in different
fields. This is abundantly clear from the following
illustrative excerpts of this book, which were referred
to during the hearing:-
"As noted above, on the first page of the book,
it is described as "A Book Indispensable to every
Businessman, Industrialist, Government Servant,
etc."
In the preface of the second edition, it is
stated "Dishonesty has become a national habit
and corruption has become a way of life."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"We have developed a tax system which requires a
boy (or girl) while introducing in business to be
taught the lessons in dishonesty, tax-evasion,
maintenance of double set of books of account,
tactics of bribing the officers and political
parties and all the vices including the supplying
of the call girls to officers and Ministers."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"Note":
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"xxx however there is no change in the
principles of income-tax or schemes for reducing
income-tax given in this book which may kindly be
noted."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
P. 2:
"Thus black money has remained not only a part of
commerce but it has become an art as well as
science-as much precise as the laws of nature|.
Thus when the black money has become a system,
why any one should remain behind in rate-race to
amass the wealth? This is the question being
asked by every person in every strata of the
society ! "
"It is not the intention of this book to
encourage the creation of black money. However,
every wise and not-so-wise person in society
should know how his neighbour and competitor in
business is prospering by raising the black money
finance to run his business and industry and
thereby stimulating the growth of the Indian
commerce and industry which are starved by the
government controlled financial institutions !"
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"xxx it is the purpose of this book to
acquaint in national interest every citizen of
India as well as a foreigner about the illegal
methods of creation of black money, its "rolling"
on, its legal as well as illegal conversion into
white and the fruitful conversion of white money
into black !"
P.7.
"Thus there is scope for tax-planning from
individual angle for both creation of black money
as well as converting it into white which keeps
the Indian democratic system and socialist
society going !"
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"xxx And in that attempt, either he suppresses
(or conceals) his income or furnishes inaccurate
particulars of income which schemes often fails
leading to unbearable tax liability and penalties
as well as costly and time-consuming legal
battles which often swallow not only the whole of
the income but also erode the health and wealth
of the tax-payer. Therefore, it is necessary to
know how to avoid such a situation and yet to use
certain standard as well as indigenous legal as
well as illegal methods which in some cases
though immoral yet are practically effective if
well-planned which are adopted by many to create
the black money without attracting tax liability
as well as the legal and illegal methods adopted
by your neighbour and competitor in business,
profession, service (colleague or "comrade"),
politics and social field to convert the black
money into white."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxxx
P.11
"However, inspite of these provisions there are
ways, methods and schemes to create the black
money to meet the needs of the situation of
business, employment or status and retain the
same as black money which though illegal and
immoral, are found to be effective in many cases
and there are also ways, methods and schemes to
convert the black money into white official money
by legal planning and otherwise. Before
discussing how black money is created, retained
and converted into white money in the light of
the above provisions and other Acts of the
Government we must have clear and detailed idea
about various provisions and principles of
assessment of "black money" and treatment of the
same under Income-tax, Wealth-tax, Gift-tax and
Estate-duty Acts."
P.86.
"Thus, in view of the very nature of the subject
of black money which offers thousands of ways of
its creation, it is not possible to detail and
expose all the methods which are individualistic
and peculiar to a person. An attempt is made in
the subsequent Chapters to detail and expose
those methods which are more prevalent in the
society but while detailing them some steps have
been skipped due to the very nature of subject
which the reader may fill up if found necessary."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"We shall now discuss briefly, the ways and
methods adopted by various persons in different
fields to create the black money."
P.102
"It is hardly necessary to teach businessmen, the
methods of creation of black money. The methods
adopted by them are very simple. They may take
any of the following forms or may use more than
one or all simultaneously:
(a) Suppression of sales,
(b) Inflation of purchases,
(c) Under-valuation of stocks,
(d) Inflation of expenses.
We shall discuss all the above methods briefly
with illustrations."
P.107
"In view of the above discussion, it can be seen
that the manipulation stocks affords a good scope
of arriving at gross profit at the desired level
which can be done as under."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"Thus out of the above three methods, this method
is most easy and convenient."
P.110
"However certain problems arise from such
manipulations which are tackled by the "clever"
assessees as under:"
P.111
"While "manipulating" the accounts, the assessee
mostly takes proper care of not being caught by
the official and he also takes "care" of the
Officer and "settles" the case on a sum of Rs.
1,000 to Rs. 5,000 which the co-operative
officer willingly does on the principle that
every person has his price."
P.114.
"The simplest method of creating black money by a
doctor is simply to omit the issue of receipt and
also omit the entry of the same in the books of
account. They also evade the tax by inflating
the allowable expenses as in the case of
businessmen. They either prepare fresh receipt
books and books of account at the end of the year
according to their requirement or use their skill
in day-to-day manipulation of books of account
and bank accounts. Such original income and
expenditure account as well as manipulated income
and expenditure account may be on the following
lines as given in the following illustration."
P.120
"The simplest method of creating black money by
lawyers, engineers etc. professionals is to omit
the issue of receipt and also to omit the entry
in the books of account, or use receipts for a
small amount, or for the payments by cheques and
partly omit the issue of receipts and entries in
the books of account. They also evade the tax by
inflating the allowable expenses as in the case
of doctors and businessmen. They either prepare
fresh receipt books and books of account at the
end of the year according to their requirements
or use their skill in receipts and payments."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"Following is the genuine income and expenditure
account of a lawyer, engineer, architects etc.
(omitting the technical details of the respective
profession."
P.121
"The manipulated profit and loss account (by
omitting the receipts as well as inflating the
expenses if necessary) may be as under:"
P.127
"If a genuine income statement is prepared for
such actor, it may be on the following lines:"
P.128
"The revised statement based on manipulated
accounts, bills, vouchers and receipts may be on
the following lines:"
P. 151
"Thus, all of the above persons can create,
circulate and hold black money."
P.158
"Thus, the agricultural income affords a great
scope for evading the income-tax on black money
by introducing the black money as agricultural
income."
P. 164
"From above discussion, it can be seen that for
the purpose of introducing black money as
agricultural income in a big way, the best course
adopted by black money hoards seems to be
"agricultural income" proper i.e. the sale of
agricultural produce raised or received as
rent-in-kind of sale of such produce."
P. 165
"The above propositions are widely used to
convert the black money into white by introducing
the black money as agricultural income. For this
purpose, the black money holder normally takes
the following procedure and precautions."
P. 168
"It may be noted that in introducing the black
money under the cover of agricultural income,
sometimes the co-operation of the Officer is
necessary and such co-operation is willingly
coming in many cases on "settlement" of, say, Rs.
1,000 to any more amount. Sometimes the tax
payer introduces the agricultural income in small
amount in the first year so that source of such
income is initially established and that makes
the way clear for introducing big dozens of black
money in the later years."
P.170
"In the subsequent chapters, we shall discuss
these method adopted by the black money holders
but in such discussion, certain steps may be
missed due to the very nature of the subject or
to avoid the repetition."
P.171
"However, as in other cases, a wise black money
holder takes resort to first deposit in the bank
and then to withdraw by cheque the amount in the
next year to "skip" the assessment if possible
even in earlier year by "assessment and forget"
method."
P.173
"The explanations prepared beforehand for cash
credit by the black money holder may be any one
of the following:"
P.174
"Planning before deposit of black money in the
books of the black money holder: To avoid the
inclusion of deposit in black money owner's
income, the following pre-planning is done in
case of each depositor when there are numerous
deposits during a year:"
P.178
"The black money holder while taking statement at
the time of deposit in bank account often keeps
the date of statement blank. He will also take
the repayment receipt from the "depositor" (if
the depositor is not the family member but an
"outsider" i.e. other than wife or husband or
some other person who is not under his control or
on whom the control is likely to be lost with the
passage of time). The repayment receipt may be
on the following lines."
P.182
"The explanation of the deposit may be prepared
on the following lines:"
P.185
"The above statement as well as affidavit, if
necessary, on the lines given at page 178 with
necessary modification of facts is taken
beforehand at the time of deposit and blank
receipt of re-payment is also obtained beforehand
when the depositor is an outsider or unreliable."
P.187
"In such a case, he mostly remains at the mercy
of the Officer where the money becomes a
commodity to be exchanged against "mercy" as
money can purchase almost anything and the
transaction goes through."
P.203
"When black money is received through arranged
gifts, the black money holder always insists on
regular documents like agreement of gift or
delivery letter accompanied by affidavit and
proper passing or receipt of gift-amounts for
certain reasons, chief of which are :"
P.240
"Smugglers have lot of black money inside India
and they utilise the import export trade-the
above methods to convert their black money into
white money."
P.247
"Once the fictitious investment is established to
be genuine (which happens on a wide scale by
"settlement" with officer and "assessment and
forget file" method as detailed earlier) or when
the assessment or re-assessment of such deposit
becomes time-barred, the same is easily
transferred to the name of the black money holder
or his family member by any of the methods,
either by "personal" responsibility or "gift"
method, as detailed earlier."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"As stated earlier, "gifts" of foreign exchange
from aboard plays a very important role in black
money economy."
P.249
"Most of the smugglers, businessmen and highly
placed government servants and ministers get
their unofficial foreign money transferred in the
form of "gifts" to either against compensatory
payments abroad or in India as discussed above
and in earlier Chapter dealing with "gifts from
abroad"."
P.250
"Legacy of the cash amounts or ornaments and
jewellery and subsequent credit of its
sale-proceeds is one of the patent explanations
given for "cash credit" introduction or
investment whether recorded or not. For this
purpose, the black money holder arranges to make
out a will of some of the near relatives or
acquaintances who had expired in the near past,
say, within last six months to three years and
files estate-duty return for the same, manages to
keep the estate-duty proceedings "dormant" for a
few years (of course, after paying up the
estate-duty which is a small amount compared to
income-tax."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"To substantiate his claim the black money holder
(Mr. X manages to get the Will of the deceased
on the following lines:"
P.254
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"Now we shall discuss some special methods of
conversion of white money into black.
Conversion of white money into black, as stated
earlier, is very easy not acquiring any lessons
or guidance on the same."
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"However, there are certain aspects of such
suppression, inflation and under-valuation which
require a brief discussion chief of which are (i)
Bogus donations to charitable trust by cheque and
refund of the said amount with receipt, (ii)
Inflating the cost of assets without making
payments and (iii) Commission entries in the
books without payments."
P.256-257
"One of the methods adopted by the businessmen to
inflate the expenses and reduce net profits is by
way of payment of "commission" to employes or
other persons under their control. For such
commission, the planning is done on the following
lines:"
xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx
"Thus, the fool-proof arrangement is made so that
the officer cannot refuse the deduction. The
agreement is mostly on the following lines with
modifications as may be necessary:"
P.259
"Both these "commission" methods convert one
black money holder's white money into black, and
another black money holder's black money is
converted into white."
P. 274
"Even a "gift chit" (prepared on the lines give
on page 206) may possibly serve the purpose to
explain the source in corruption charge, as no
source is to be inquired in the case of the donor
or the person who has sent for custody."
17. The findings of the Council in the present case
are based on the nature of the writings contained in the
book authored by the respondent and printed and published
by his sons. Excerpts from the book with which the
respondent was confronted are not mere academic exercise,
but a systematic effort to educate and train the reader
to arrange his affairs in a manner that would make him
successfully evade taxes. It is a "treatise" on dubious
ways of dodging the taxes by preparing false accounts,
secreting books of accounts, filing false statements and
returns, bribing the officials, forging wills,
agreements, receipts and other documents. We have gone
through such writings from the book supplied to us by the
learned counsel and are amazed at the audacity of the
delinquent to justify such putrid performance of inciting
criminal acts by tax payers by emboldening them into a
belief that they can get away by adopting the
manipulative tactics suggested in the book and by
corrupting the officials. The author is confident that
every public officer can be bought and no harm will be
done if the methods of evasion that he has suggested for
"planning" are adopted. The book has been written with a
total disregard of the high standards that the profession
has proclaimed nationally and internationally. The
material compiled in the book if followed would put the
profession to shame, throwing to the winds the laudable
norms of integrity and truthfulness expected of its
members. Far from preventing tax payers from adopting
such unfair tactics he exhorts them to adopt methods
which would result in serious offences being committed
under the Income-tax Act and the Indian Penal Code. The
delinquent has overlooked that he is advocating
commission of economic offences, (The Income Tax Act, the
Wealth Tax Act, the Gift Tax Act and FERA are included in
the Schedule of the Economic Offences Inapplicability of
Limitation Act, 1974). The book assumes that all tax
payers and officials - virtually everybody is a crook and
easily evades the law for selfish purposes and emphasizes
that no one shall be left behind his neighbour in the
race of tax evasion. Unfortunately, the writer has no
idea of the extent of good that surrounds him in the
society which has prompted the Code of Conduct. All that
we can say is we pity the cynisism displayed by the
author. A cynical public view about the ethics of
individual professionals spills over into a strong
suspicion against the integrity of the entire profession.
If the professions do not take strong steps to not only
policing their members but also to ensure that the public
believes that they are doing so, it would call for
increasing governmental policing.
18. The manner in which the book is written and its
tenor clearly indicate that the author intends to pander
to the evil designs of those who want to safely generate
"black money" and get away with it by "planning" for tax
evasion as per the methods shown differently for
different professions by laboriously preparing
illustrations showing how genuine accounts can be
manipulated and fake documents such as wills, agreements,
receipts, custody chits can be drafted. The book is a
clear venture on the part of this professional to reach
out with such guile assistance to the generators of
"black money" and tax evaders to educate them through
this writing how they can evade the law and reduce their
tax liability. There cannot be a professional misconduct
more grave than this on the part of a member of the noble
profession of Chartered Accountants. The Council
therefore rightly found him to be guilty of a conduct
unbecoming of a member of the profession who should have
been shown the door long back, having regard to the
damage that can be done to the interest of general public
by rendering such assistance to generation of "black
money" and evasion of taxes by adopting unlawful means
and committing acts which are offences under the law.
19. It was argued that the disciplinary committee had
gone beyond the charges levelled against the respondent
when it held that in its opinion the fact of writing the
book in this manner "is to educate public as to how to
evade tax and how to create black money". The Committee
held that the member of the noble profession of Chartered
Accountants ought not to have resorted to such means and
thereby lower the image of the profession. The word
"educate" in the context of the charges levelled against
the respondent would mean to give training and / or
information on a particular field. The methods of tax
evasion detailed in the book with meticulously worked out
steps that can be taken for evading the taxes are aimed
at various sections of the general public. They are told
what is to be done to create secret income and how to
evade tax in different fields. The findings reached by
the disciplinary committee and the Council cannot be said
to be going beyond the scope of the charges levelled
against the respondent in which it was in terms alleged
that the author had explained in detail various methods
of creation of black money and the methods, legal or
illegal, generally adopted to convert it into "white" and
further that, it appeared that the title of the book, its
preface and in totality the book was likely to create an
impression in the eyes of the common man that the
Chartered Accountants are experts in creation of "black
money" and its conversion into "white money". It was in
terms alleged that the conduct of the respondent in
writing such a book was unbecoming of a Chartered
Accountant. There is, therefore, no substance in the
contention that the findings reached by the disciplinary
body are beyond the charges levelled against the
respondent.
20. It is urged that, in exercise of his fundamental
rights, the respondent was entitled to point out in his
writings the methods which were widely adopted by
different sections of the community to generate and
manage "black money". It was submitted that no
disciplinary action can be taken by the Council in
respect of the said work of the respondent even if the
writing was not palatable to any particular reader.
20.1 The Chartered Accountants Act was enacted to make
provision for the regulation of the profession of
Chartered Accountants and for that purpose, to establish
an Institute of Chartered Accountants. A Council of the
Institute for management of the affairs of the institute
is constituted by section 9. The functions of the
Council are enumerated in section 15 which include
removal of names from the Register and restoration of
names which have been removed, the regulation and
maintenance of the status of the members and standards of
the professional qualifications, and, the exercise of
disciplinary powers conferred by the Act, as provided by
clauses (h), (i) and (k) of sub-section (2) of Section
15. The disciplinary committee is to be one of the
standing committees of the Council to be constituted by
it from amongst its members. Under section 20(2), the
Council shall remove the name of any member in respect of
whom the order is passed under the Act removing him from
membership of the institute. Section 21 provides for the
procedure in inquiries relating to professional or other
misconduct of members of the institute. Section 22 which
defines "professional misconduct" reads as under :
"22. Professional misconduct defined -
For the purposes of this Act, the
expression "professional misconduct" shall be
deemed to include any act or omission specified
in any of the Schedules, but nothing in this
section shall be construed to limit or abridge in
any way the power conferred or duty cast on the
Council under sub-section (1) of section 21 to
inquire into the conduct of any member of the
Institute under any other circumstances."
20.2 Thus, the Council has wide powers to regulate the
conduct of its members and take disciplinary action. In
exercise of its power and duty to carry out the objects
of the Act, the Council can make regulations under
Section 30, inter alia, providing for the exercise of
disciplinary powers conferred by the Act. In respect of
the professional misconduct of a member, the Council can
make order under Section 21(4) of reprimanding the member
or removing his name for a period not exceeding five
years and in case it appears to the Council that the name
of such member should be removed for more than five years
or permanently, the Council will forward the
recommendation to the High Court. In cases of misconduct
other than professional misconduct which is specified in
the Schedules, the cases of the members found guilty will
be forwarded to the High Court by it with with
recommendations as contemplated by sub-section (5) of
section 21 of the Act.
20.3 The Council in exercise of its wide powers as a
custodian of the interests of the profession and its
members has issued a Code of Conduct. The highest norm
universally accepted by the profession is of maintaining
integrity which implies not merely honesty but fair
dealing and truthfulness. Any member who encourages
untruthfulness and fabrication of false evidence in the
taxation procedure will obviously be acting in a manner
unbecoming of a member of such noble profession, which
would be a misconduct. Violation of the ethical norms by
a member which has an effect of encouraging tax evasion
would be against public interest and can rightly be
treated as "other misconduct" when not falling in the
instances of professional misconduct specified in the
Schedules or notified thereunder.
20.4 A Code of Ethics is a legally binding statement
of conduct. The Code of Conduct issued by the Institute
proclaimed as follows :
"Code of Conduct -
xxxxx
A client, before engaging the services of a
professional man, requires to be assured: (i)
that he has the required competence and (ii) that
he is a man of character and integrity. As
regards the first, evidence is available to the
client in the form of a certificate that the
accountant has undergone the training and passed
the examination, and as regards the second, he
would have an assurance only if the professional
body to which he belongs has adopted a code of
professional conduct. The noble traditions set
up by the learned professions, such as,
Ecclesiastics, Medicine and Law, have been
followed by others, with a view to instil public
trust and confidence. The over-riding motto has
been `pride of service in preference to personal
gain'. A code of professional conduct may have
the force of law, as is the case in this country
in some matters, as well as the result of
discipline and established conventions
voluntarily undertaken by the members, any breach
whereof would result in the person being
disentitled to continue as a member of the
professional body. In any event, it has a great
deal of practical value in so far as it proclaims
to the public that the members of the profession
will carry on their duties and responsibilities,
having regard to the public interest. This, in
turn, will give an assurance to the public that
in the event of a member straying away from the
path of duty, he would be suitably dealt with by
the professional body.
Human nature being what it is, a man can be
selfish - to place his personal gain above
service. Therefore, persons who as individuals
and as a class, are willing to place public good
above their personal gain deserve praise and
honour. This is the main reason why professional
men have enjoyed prestige and honour. But such a
relationship can be maintained or enhanced only
if the professional body would interpret the
concept of public interest and the necessity for
the professional man to watch it as broadly as
possible. It is also necessary for it to guide
and compel the members to live up to these high
standard."
21. By the provisions of Section 15(2)(e) read with
Section 6 of the Act, a certificate of practice may be
granted or refused by the Council under the Act. The Act
recognizes that the profession itself is the best judge
of what constitutes an ethical behaviour in its ranks and
therefore, gives wide powers to the Council to take
action not only in respect of the specified and / or
notified misconduct, which is deemed to be professional
misconduct, but also for "other misconduct". It is a
great compliment to the profession that its own duly
adopted standards are given the force and effect of law.
This is possible, because, the members of the profession
have accepted the responsibility of their professional
practices. This is what distinguish a true professional
from a non-professional - a willingness to recognize need
for standards, an ability to articulate what those
standards should be, and commitment to maintaining those
standards, not out of fear of non-compliance, but
instead, out of a belief that the standards have
intrinsic worth. The members should proudly follow the
ethical principles, because, they represent a deep and
thoughtful commitment to the professionalism in the
accounting sphere.
21.1 The Code of Conduct clearly emphasizes the
requirement that a professional man should be a man of
character and integrity which is a fundamental norm
universally recognized in this profession. The wordings
of Section 22 that the expression "professional
misconduct" shall be deemed to include any act or
omission specified in any of the Schedules shows that the
types of professional misconduct enumerated in the
Schedules to the Act are only illustrative and no
exhaustive definition of "professional misconduct" is
intended. Therefore, there can be misconduct outside the
specifically enumerated or notified acts of omissions or
commissions deemed to be included in the expression
"professional misconduct", which is a professional
misconduct not so enumerated under the Schedule, as also
misconduct other than any professional misconduct. The
wide powers of the Council to cope up with professional
and other misconduct which are not specified in the
Schedules are kept intact. This is why, in the First
Edition of the Code of Conduct, it was stated: "The
booklet basically gives elaborate explanations, where
necessary with illustrations, of the various items
comprised in the Schedules to the Chartered Accountants
Act, and is by no means meant to be exhaustive of all
acts of omission and commission which may constitute
"professional misconduct".
21.2 The Code of Conduct which is declared by the
Council as a regulatory statutory body created to
safeguard the interests of the profession, its members
and the general public is nothing but an adoption of
principles of decency and morality which the members are
expected to follow. The duty to carry out the provisions
of the Act including the duty to exercise disciplinary
powers conferred by the Act vests in the Council.
Therefore, when it takes disciplinary action against a
member, who commits serious violation of ethical norms
which, according to the Council, amounts to misconduct,
it simply exercises statutory powers. The statutory
provisions empowering the Council to take disciplinary
action against a member of the institute who violates
ethical norms and encourages commission of serious
economic and other offences, would clearly be a
reasonable restriction on the exercise of the fundamental
right to freedom of speech and expression in the interest
of decency and morality and in relation to incitement to
an offence. It is, however, pertinent to note that the
disciplinary power is, in the present case, primarily
exercised for removing the respondent from the membership
of the institute after being found guilty of misconduct
and does not directly prevent him from exercising right
to freedom of speech and expression under Article
19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The provisions of the said
Act enabling the disciplinary action being taken against
a member committing misconduct which may include
advocating tax evasion would clearly be a reasonable
restriction imposed by law, in the interest of general
public on the exercise of right to freedom of practising
profession guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) of the
Constitution. When the restriction is justified under
Article 19(6), membership of the profession cannot be
claimed as a fundamental right for carrying on the
profession. The position so lost cannot be retrieved by
resorting to the fundamental right to freedom of speech
and expression, because, the impugned action primarily
has an impact on the membership of the professional body
from which he could be removed for a professional or
other misconduct as statutorily provided.
21.3 The statutory power to take action in respect of
misconduct is not meant to curtail freedom of speech and
expression, but to ensure proper conduct of the members
of the institute and to protect the interest and prestige
of the profession of Chartered Accountants. If the
member commits misconduct by committing breach of the
Code of Conduct and does anything detrimental to the
interest and prestige of the profession, he is liable to
disciplinary action under Section 21 which is not
designed to restrict in any way the freedom of speech or
expression. It is primarily designed to regulate the
profession of the Chartered Accountants. It cannot,
therefore, be called in question as violating of Article
19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Misconduct may consist of
writing an offensive article or delivering a foul speech
which are not in the interest of general public or are
contrary to decency or morality or amount to inciting an
offence or any other unlawful activity. Any action which
is detrimental to the interest or prestige of the
profession of Chartered Accountants, clearly undermines
disciplinary standards set up by the norms of ethical
conduct. The provisions of disciplinary action against
the members can be better looked at from the point of
view of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article
19(1)(g) read with restrictions that can be imposed under
Clause (6) of Article 19 as reasonable restrictions in
the interests of general public. The statutory
provisions which are directly linked with and are
essential for the regulation of the profession of the
Chartered Accountants would be protected by Clause (6) of
Article 19 of the Constitution as being in the interest
of general public. If such provisions are alleged to
violate other freedoms under Article 19(1) such as,
freedom of speech or expression, the freedoms have to be
read harmoniously so that the statutory provisions
including the rules and regulations which are reasonably
required in furtherance of one freedom are not struck
down as violating the other freedoms (See M.H.Devendrappa
v/s Karnataka State Small Industries Corporation (1998) 3
SCC 732).
21.4 The statutory provisions enabling the Council to
take disciplinary action against the members for
misconduct do not in their pith and substance deal with
their fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of freedom
of speech and expression and do not have any direct or
indirect effect to abridge or abrogate such rights. The
mere fact that the disciplinary provisions enacted to
regulate the profession may incidentally, remotely or
collaterally have the effect on the right to freedom of
speech and expression of the member, would not vitiate
the disciplinary action in respect of a misconduct
committed through the medium of writing. To put it
straight - a member of the profession of Chartered
Accountants, behaving contrary to the Code of Conduct and
therefore, found guilty of misconduct by the Council and
facing removal from membership, that would affect his
right to carry on his profession as Chartered Accountant
cannot cry halt on a spacious plea that he has a freedom
to commit such misconduct when it comes to be done
through writing or speech. The answer to him would be if
your speech and expression are foul, go ahead at your
risk, but cease to be a member of this profession first.
Everything we do has a consequence, that is a plain and
simple matter of physics. The doer of a deed has a
responsibility for the consequences of his thought, words
and deeds. There is, thus, no substance in the
contention raised on behalf of the respondent on the
ground that his fundamental right to speech and
expression would be violated by imposing punishment of
removal of his name from the Register of members of the
Institute which has a bearing on the freedom of
profession rather than freedom of speech and expression.
22. The conduct of the respondent in associating with
the methods of tax evasion rather than denouncing them,
to say the least, is a gross misconduct on the part of a
member of a noble profession which is worst than solitary
lapses of the tax payers. It should have merited instant
removal from the profession when the book was first
published in 1982. The Council ought to be prompt in
such cases and so should we be, and not let such serious
matters linger on for decades and let such published
material provide a ready guidance to evasion of taxes to
those who would be prone to follow the patterns of tax
evasion craftily displayed by the respondent. The delay
has, however, worked in favour of the respondent, who has
continued to remain a member of the institute for all
these years. The respondent has proved himself to be
capable of such infamous conduct by which he will be a
constant danger to the public, as also to young men
aspiring to enter the profession of Chartered
Accountants. The recommended punishment of removal of
his name for six months would, in our opinion, be a
mockery of the proceedings in view of the serious nature
of misconduct. Permanent removal of name from the
Register would, in such cases, be clearly warranted. We,
therefore, have heard the respondent who is present in
the Court, on the question of punishment. He has stated
before us that it was never his intention to prompt
anyone for tax evasion. He says that he has written what
was prevailing in the society at that time, and that even
the government had announced many schemes for voluntary
disclosure of black money from time to time. He states
that he is still in the profession and is 73 years of
age, having health problems, such as, blood pressure and
teeth problem. He says that he very much regrets if
there is any misconduct found on his part. He also
states that he has sold away the copyright in the book in
the year 1987. He further states that he is taking
medicines for cardiac problem, though it is not very
serious. He also states that he has not indulged in any
such writing after the book was published and he
sincerely regrets about it. He states that he regrets
having written such a book and he will never write such
things in future. In short, according to him, he feels
repentant in respect of the writings in this book.
23. Having regard to the old age of the respondent,
ailments that he is suffering from, repentance that he
has shown in the Court and the time-lag that has elapsed,
as also his statement that he has never published any
such writing after the publication of the said book, in
our opinion, interest of justice will be met if the
respondent is removed forthwith from the membership of
the institute for a period of five years. We,
accordingly, while upholding the finding of the Council
holding the respondent guilty of misconduct, direct that
the respondent be removed forthwith from the membership
of the institute for a period of five years. The
Reference stands disposed of accordingly, with no order
as to costs.
24. At this stage, the learned counsel for the
respondent submits that the operation of this order may
be stayed to enable the respondent to approach the higher
forum. In our opinion, in the facts and circumstances of
the case, it will be improper for us to stay the
operation of this order when the removal of the
respondent was due long back, having regard to the
serious nature of the misconduct committed by him.
[R.K.ABICHANDANI, J.] [A.L.DAVE, J.]
Parmar*
|